Can you logically have a secular point of view, and hold a deep true passion for social justice and equity world wide? I don't know, it seems too much like a paradox to me...
As an assignment for one of my classes my professor asked
each member of the class to write what influenced us to enter into the field of
public health, more specifically global health. I thought it was an interesting
exercise and was excited to not only reflect within myself and put my motives
on paper, but also to see what had drawn my classmates to the seats beside me.
At the beginning of class the professor read quite a few of the answers anonymously.
I was blown away at the remarkable number of people that put "a desire to fight
for social equity and social justice worldwide" as their motivation and number one influencing factor. Many cited
the church or Catholic practices as the birthplace of their exposure to helping
others, though they made it quite clear that they did not choose to pursue this
field because of any religious belief or church. (In fact, my professor has made it quite clear that he does not believe in a God accompanied by many nods of agreement from my classmates) Interesting…all this talk of social
justice and human's rights without a God got me thinking...is that paradoxical?
What is social justice and do all humans deserve it? Do all
humans deserve the right to education, health care, clean water, electricity,
plumbing? Are there basic human rights? If so, who came up with them? Who said
that each person is entitled to a set of universal rights strictly because they
are a person, alive? (In fact, the UN has a
Universal Declaration of Human Rights)Why do we have rights? Why are we?
I think it is all about your perception of who people are, what a
person is. From a secular point of view, I really just don't get it. Please help me to
understand: Why fight for social justice if you don't believe in a logical reason for justice, if
you don't believe in God, if you believe in the 'American dream' mindset, if you believe in logic and intellectual reason over mysticism? If
you don't believe in a Creator and family among the human race, why care so
much about others?
According to evolution (or spontaneously accidental creation), man formed
overtime beginning with a hot mess of chemicals and
elements some billions of years ago. Throughout time, the theory of survival of
the fittest ensued and only the species that learned to out survive, out run,
out think, out plan other species, indeed survived. So we get to man from this
soup along the evolutionary bio-chain.
Within the human race, would you predict that the survival
of the fittest to still hold true? Maybe. That would explain the huge health
disparities observable between continents, countries, even counties and
districts within nations. That would explain a lot. BUT it would fail to
explain social justice and why people fight for that, why people are even aware
or sensitive to the idea of social justice. If it is survival of the fittest,
why would you want to 'help a brother out?' Go out of your way to serve another,
love another, fight for another if there is no observable benefit for yourself
or your own personal survival (or survival of loved ones)? Maybe on an
emotional level there is the benefit-to feel better about oneself, giving you
an emotional edge over other people? The happier a person is, the longer they
will most likely live? (what is happiness anyway?) So by helping other people,
fighting for others' 'rights', you indeed are extending your own longevity, your own survival? That is
one way of looking at it, I guess…
Alternatively, maybe survival of the fittest isn't so much a
concept on the individual level, but more so on a species or communal level.
Lions travel in prides right without killing each other? Birds in flocks, and
fish (naturally the most intelligent) in schools. As a species maybe we feel
the need to band together and fight for one another so that we, the human race,
will endure for all eternity (or until a huge meteor from space takes us out,
ice age part 2 anyone?). To me, this theory
would make more sense (again, from a secular point of view). That would do a
better job of explaining why people fight for social justice…though it still
does little to resolve the issue of where these so called human rights come
from, and why as a human being we deserve or should be warranted such rights.
However, the question is thus posed that if this is indeed true and we as a
race feel an innate need to band together for the survival of our species, why
did disparities even form in the first place? What made man first feel the
sensation of entitlement and superiority causing others to fall out of reach from the socioeconomic
ladder or below the poverty line while they ran ahead in fields of opportunity and advancement? Why are we not all living in equal luxury or lack of
luxury? According to this theory, disparities
should not be among us. We should look for the survival of our species
as a whole…or maybe our idea of 'species' has evolved into a new definition, to
instead refer to our own population or nation or cohort. I mean we now have
culturalism, patriotism, racism, nationalism right? Where we take pride and unite with our own nation, race, culture, etc. But again, that would lead
to yet another unresolved question of why fight for social justice for a
population or cohort other than your own? Why? Why travel abroad, why leave comforts,
why demand equal rights for all if that 'all' is not solely encompassed within your
immediate vicinity? I just don't get it. What makes you aware of these
injustices and what is justice? Have we evolved yet again to just thrive off of
a sense of adventure? Do we long so bad to feel good about ourselves and thus
help others? That does not explain the passion I see on news' reels of marches
and protests, it does not explain the urgency eminent on my classmates faces
when the topic of equity and social justice arises in classes. So much
unexplained…if you don't believe in God.
Maybe people want to help others because they are searching for a hope in the meaninglessness of life. They reason that if they can bring hope to another, bring good and change into someone else's life, that will give their life meaning and purpose. Otherwise, as a being created from a heated chemical stew, our lives are quite frankly meaningless and just random chance. There is no hope. People long for meaning and purpose, and more so the hope of that. From a secular point of view though, there is no hope. Once again, social justice is not a logical cause even if on conquest for a sense of hope. Hope simply can not exist apart from God.
The Bible explains all of this. It is very clear that no one
deserves a thing, we don't deserve the right to medicine, or technology, or
clean water, or love, or justice, nothing! Yet, we have it. That is by the
grace of God, our Creator, who loves us thus has bestowed all of these upon us.
Yet disparities exist. Does this mean that those with advantage or more access
to their 'rights' are more loved by God? Does the existence of disparities
question the goodness and love of God? Absolutely not. God has empowered the
human mind with knowledge which has led to the creation of technology,
economics, medicine, etc. Again, a gift from Him. It is how humans have used
this gift that has created the disparities we see today. The fact that health
and socioeconomic disparities exist is merely a reflection of the sin inside of
man. The desire to serve oneself over others, and the desire to feel superior
by excluding others. Quite a paradox then to fight for social justice. War and
hate, sin and a desire for entitlement is in each man's heart. This has led to
the limiting of access and available opportunities for advancement worldwide. This has segregated populations, nations, cultures and brothers globally and locally. While man has the
propensity, the desire to be good, he cannot. (with Christ we are made one with
Him and thus overcome our sin). Maybe man fights for social justice
because he wants to be good, he has that desire. He knows, he feels that there
is something not quite right with the world today, things aren’t as they were
intended to be. And they aren't, this isn't the way God intended for Creation
to go (though He knew it would). Maybe that instinct of wanting to be good is what leads non Christians
to fight for social justice, to feel and believe that each human has a set of
universal rights though they can't yet explain why. They are trying to fix the
wrong of this world, the reflections of sin in this world. But they can't. Not
without God. "If a man abides in me and me in him, he will bear much
fruit. Apart from me you can do nothing!"
While I still have no idea why a non Christian would be
passionate about social justice or more specifically choose to go into the
field of global public health, I know why Christians do. "He has shown you,
O man, what is good, and what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and
to love mercy, and to walk humbly before your God." "Love your
neighbor as yourself." "Love even your enemies." "They will know you are His by your
love." "Do nothing out of selfish ambition or vain conceit, but in
humility consider others better than yourself." "Therefore go and
make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father,
the Son, and the Holy Spirit and surely I am with you until the end of the
ages." "Dear brothers, let us not love with word or tongue, but in
actions and in truth." We have a responsibility as Christians to love the
unlovable, to bring hope to the hopeless, to seek the lost, and to open doors
of opportunity and joy to the broken and abandoned. That is why I am in Public
Health. To act justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God that all
the earth may know that He is. That, my friend, is no paradox.